A hastily formed “Virginia” provisional legislature was assembled in Wheeling, Virginia. It formally approved the formation of the state and technically met the requirements of the Constitution that the state and Congress must approve a measure to form a new state within its borders. Whether or not this met the requirements set out in that clause is still debated. The creation of West Virginia as a state was done slightly differently from other states because it was part of Virginia. Leland is wrong. The Republican government they refer to has no connection to the GOP. Republicanism is a term derived from the thought of the Enlightenment and the philosophers of the Enlightenment. The ideals behind republicanism are life, liberty and property. If you look at James Madison`s Federalist 10, you`ll notice similarities to what was said in this section. That`s because it was based on that. It does not refer to Republicans and Democrats, but to factions; Majority and minority groups.

They have provided state governments to try to limit the impact of factions or large political groups that stifle what all minority groups have to say. In fact, this part of the Constitution was made precisely for the purpose of opposing what you have done. Make politics a matter of political prestige and not a better solution for all. Please learn more about political issues next time and please don`t do politics on Democrats or Republicans. Research all aspects of the argument and vote on what is best for our country. Thank you very much. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, a proposal to include the phrase “new States should be admitted under the same conditions as States of origin” was rejected. There were fears that the political power of the future new Western states would eventually overwhelm that of the established eastern states. However, once the new constitution went into effect, Congress authorized Vermont and Kentucky on an equal footing, and then formalized the condition in its license files for subsequent states, declaring that the new state “enters on an equal footing with the states of origin in all respects.” Thus, Congress took advantage of the discretion granted by the authors and adopted a policy of equal status for all newly admitted states. [7] With increased support for state rights during the pre-war period, the Supreme Court in pollard v.

Hagan (1845)[9], that the Constitution required the admission of new states on the basis of equality. [10] The Constitution is silent on whether a state can unilaterally leave or secede from the Union. However, the Supreme Court found in Texas v. White (1869) that a state cannot do this unilaterally. [11] This paragraph requires each state to treat the citizens of a state equally. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel F. Miller wrote in 1873 that the sole purpose of this paragraph was “to explain to the various states that whatever these rights are, as you grant or justify them to your own citizens, or if you restrict or restrict or restrict their exercise, the same thing, no more and no less, shall be the measure of the rights of the citizens of other States within your jurisdiction.” This clause, commonly referred to as the property clause or “territorial” clause, gives Congress the constitutional power to administer and control any territory or other property belonging to the United States. In addition, the clause also states that nothing contained in the Constitution may be construed as prejudicial to any claim of the United States or any particular state. The exact scope of this clause has long been contested. This section dictates what the responsibilities of the states are in relation to the locals as well as in relation to each other, depending on a series of events that could take place in the states.

There are guidelines on how to govern the people and deal with neighboring states. The Constitution does not explain what exactly constitutes a republican form of government. However, there are several places where the principles behind the concept are articulated. Article Seven, the last and shortest of the original articles of the Constitution, stipulated that before the Constitution could be established as the “law of the land”, it had to obtain the consent of the people by ratifying it through people`s assemblies in the various states. Since the Constitution required the ratification of only nine states to establish itself, rather than the unanimous approval required by the articles of Confederation, it was more republican because it protected the majority from being effectively governed or imprisoned by the minority. [18] “The founders believed that political decisions would have to be made by a majority (or in some cases, a majority) of voting citizens for the government to be Republican. Citizens can act either directly or through elected representatives. In any case, the Republican government was accountable to the government to the citizens,” wrote Robert G.

Natelson, a senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute. protection by the government; the joy of living and freedom. the right of a citizen of a State to travel to or reside in another State for commercial, agricultural, professional or other purposes; take advantage of habeas corpus writing; bring and maintain actions of any kind before the courts of the State; take, hold and dispose of property, whether real or personal; and exemption from taxes or duties higher than those paid by other citizens of the State. A political crisis in Rhode Island in the 1840s, the Dorr Rebellion, forced the Supreme Court to rule on the meaning of this clause. At the time, the Rhode Island Constitution was the old royal charter introduced in the 17th century. In the 1840s, only 40% of the free white men in the state had the right to vote. An attempt to hold a popular convention to write a new constitution was declared an uprising by the Charter government, and Congressional leaders were arrested. .